Sheikh Hasina, the Prime Minister of Bangladesh, was elected for a fifth term|Photo by ANI
In Bangladesh, where democracy has always been a topic of debate, the 2024 national election sent a shockwave across the nation. The ruling Awami League, led by Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, secured yet another term, but the path to victory was far from the democratic ideals the country claims to uphold. Instead, the election reflected a calculated, strategic approach that many argue was “engineered” by the Awami League to maintain its grip on power. The reality is a concerning one: with opposition silenced, voter turnout low, and foreign powers watching closely, Bangladesh’s political future looks troubling.
Overview of the 2024 Election and the Role of Awami League
This election was unlike any other in Bangladesh’s recent history. The Awami League’s victory was hardly a surprise, but the way they achieved it raised eyebrows across the globe. Critics argue that the Awami League used its authority to sideline the opposition, effectively turning what should have been a competitive election into a one-party show. Many believe that the Awami League went to enormous lengths to stay in power, orchestrating a series of moves to prevent any real challenge to their rule. This outcome has only heightened fears that Bangladesh is moving further from democracy and closer to a one-party authoritarian state.
How Opposition Suppression Shaped the Election
If there was one defining feature of this election, it was the systematic suppression of opposition parties, especially the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP). Starting months before the election, the government targeted BNP leaders and supporters with arrests, intimidation, and even physical violence. Facing this harsh crackdown, the BNP had little choice but to withdraw, effectively leaving the Awami League as the only serious player in the election. In some districts, reports even suggest that the Awami League placed “fake” opposition candidates to create an illusion of competition. This tactic not only stifled real political choice but also sent a clear message to anyone considering opposing the ruling party.
Voter Turnout and Public Sentiment
Despite official reports claiming about 40% voter turnout, on-the-ground accounts suggest the actual numbers were likely much lower. With no real choice at the polls, many Bangladeshis felt voting was meaningless and stayed home. Economic struggles, high inflation, and frustrations over governance added to the apathy. Rather than celebrating another democratic exercise, the election turned into a stark reminder of the disconnect between the government and its citizens. Many feel that the election wasn’t just a loss for the opposition but a loss for democracy itself in Bangladesh.
Geopolitical Factors and the Role of Foreign Influence
Bangladesh has long been a focal point for powerful countries like the United States, China, and India, all vying for influence. While the U.S. expressed concerns about democratic backsliding and imposed sanctions on Bangladeshi officials, the Awami League has found strong allies in China and India. These two countries see Hasina’s rule as a source of stability in a volatile region and thus prioritize their own strategic interests over democratic principles. This geopolitical balancing act has allowed the Awami League to tighten its grip on power with less fear of international backlash.
Implications of the Awami League’s Fourth Consecutive Term
The immediate aftermath of the election sees the Awami League in a challenging position, even as they celebrate victory. Domestically, economic issues like inflation and a weakening currency are hitting ordinary Bangladeshis hard. The international community, especially Western countries, has expressed concern over the fairness of the election, with potential repercussions for foreign aid and investment. But the bigger risk lies within the country itself, where the public’s frustration with both the government and the political system is nearing a breaking point.
Future of Bangladesh’s Political Landscape
The political scene in Bangladesh is shifting, with the country veering toward a one-party system. Many fear that without a strong opposition, there is little to keep the ruling party in check. Calls for dialogue between the Awami League and the BNP have grown louder, with some suggesting that a negotiated settlement could bring stability. However, the entrenched distrust between the two parties makes meaningful cooperation seem unlikely. Unless the government takes steps to include opposition voices, Bangladesh risks further political isolation and unrest.
International and Domestic Reactions Moving Forward
Although the Awami League has retained power, it faces criticism from both domestic and international observers. The U.S. and other Western nations may impose further sanctions, harming Bangladesh’s economy. Within the country, public sentiment is souring, and if the Awami League continues to ignore these concerns, they may face growing unrest and resistance. The pressure is mounting for a shift toward genuine democratic reforms that can restore confidence in the government and bring stability back to Bangladesh.
The People’s Voice—Silenced but Resilient
The heart of Bangladesh’s democracy lies with its people, yet in this election, their voices were conspicuously absent. The fear and frustration that led many to abstain from voting reflect a deep-seated disillusionment. For many citizens, this election wasn’t just a political event; it was a painful reminder that their voices are being stifled. With fewer avenues to express dissent, Bangladeshis are left wondering if the political system is truly serving them. In the face of government crackdowns and economic strain, the people’s resilience is being tested like never before.
A Threat to the Future of Bangladesh
The consequences of this election extend beyond political parties and power struggles. By stifling democratic participation, the Awami League has set Bangladesh on a dangerous path, where public discontent may give rise to radical resistance. If the government continues to ignore the cries of its people, the country risks falling into severe political instability. The current trajectory is pushing Bangladesh closer to authoritarianism, and without significant changes, it may lead to a more volatile, less democratic future.
The Verdict
The 2024 election has left Bangladesh at a crossroads. While the Awami League may view their victory as a win, the cost to the nation is clear. The suppression of opposition voices, the manipulation of the electoral process, and the growing disconnect between the government and the people have taken a toll on Bangladesh’s democratic values. Moving forward, the Awami League faces a critical choice: they can either continue down this path of authoritarian rule or take steps toward inclusivity, transparency, and true democracy. The people of Bangladesh deserve a government that represents their voices, respects their choices, and values their future. For Bangladesh to thrive, it must reclaim the principles of democracy and embrace a political system that serves the will of its citizens.